|JNCC prepared updated formal conservation advice for East Rockall Bank SAC in March 2018. Further information is available in the Conservation Advice section below.|
Status: Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
East Rockall Bank SAC is situated 320 km west of the Outer Hebrides, to the west of Scotland. The site runs along the eastern edge of Rockall Bank, which forms a steep escarpment descending into the Rockall Trough at approximately 1,000–1,500 m deep
East Rockall Bank SAC is situated 320 km west of the Outer Hebrides, to the west of Scotland. The site runs along the eastern edge of Rockall Bank, which forms a steep escarpment descending into the Rockall Trough at approximately 1,000–1,500 m deep.
The site includes protection for all three types of Annex I reef habitat: bedrock reef, stony reef and biogenic reef. The slope of the eastern flank of Rockall Bank has a ledge of exposed bedrock running along its length that supports bedrock reef. The reef changes to stony reef further down the slope. Iceberg ploughmarks occur on the eastern edge of the summit of Rockall Bank, where stony reef and coral rubble have been observed. The north of the site contains parasitic cones that are characterised by cold water biogenic reef.
More detailed site information can be found in the Summary section.
Map displaying the East Rockall Bank MPA boundary and associated protected feature data. Visit JNCC's MPA Mapper to further view and explore data for this MPA.
Legislation behind the designation: EU Habitats Directive 1992 transposed into UK law by The Conservation of Offshore Marine Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended).
|1170 Reefs||Annex I Habitat*|
*For the latest Annex I habitat resource figures, please see the link to the latest Habitats Directive Article 17 reporting in the Assessment section.
Specific information on the conservation objectives relating to this site is provided in the Conservation advice section.
The acquisition of new data may result in updates to our knowledge on feature presence and extent within this site. The most up-to-date information is reflected on the map in this section and in JNCC’s MPA mapper, and the evidence underpinning this can be viewed in the Evidence section.
The diagram below is a summary of the key milestones involved in the selection and designation of East Rockall Bank SAC. More detail can be found within the Relevant Documentation section.
The documents referred to below and any other historical documents relating to East Rockall Bank SAC were produced during the selection and designation process and therefore may be out of date. This Site Information Centre is the most up to date source of information for this MPA, and will reflect any additional information gathered since these documents were produced. Information about the SAC site selection process is available on the JNCC SAC webpages.
- Standard Data Form – Details the SAC and the designated features.
- SAC Selection Assessment Document – Overview of the SAC, designated features and rationale for site selection.
- Post-consultation Report and Impact Assessment – Overview of the consultation outcomes, and an assessment of the environmental, social and economic costs and benefits of the designation.
- JNCC's formal conservation advice for this site is provided in the Conservation Advice section.
The relevant documentation for this site is available on JNCC's Resource Hub.
Last updated: October 2017
The information for this site summary was adapted from documents listed in the Relevant Documentation section and incorporates any further information gathered since these documents were produced.
East Rockall Bank SAC is situated 320 km west of the Outer Hebrides, to the west of Scotland. The site runs along the eastern edge of a geological feature known as Rockall Bank. Rockall Bank is orientated north-east to south-west and is approximately 450 km long and 200 km wide. The eastern flank of Rockall Bank forms a scalloped and faulted scarp slope, composed of areas of exposed bedrock and mixed substrates of boulders, cobbles and pebbles. The slope drops steeply into the Rockall Trough at approximately 1,000–1,500 m deep.
The site was selected as a SAC because it contains all three types of Annex I reef habitat: bedrock reef, stony reef and biogenic reef. The slope of the eastern flank of Rockall Bank has a ledge of exposed bedrock running along the length that supports bedrock reef, consisting of lobose sponges, encrusting sponges and assemblages of lace (stylasterid) corals. The bedrock reef changes to stony reef further down the slope, composed of greater abundances of sponges and fewer lace corals.
Fine sand with iceberg ploughmarks occur on the eastern edge of the summit of Rockall Bank. Here, stony reef supports erect bryozoans, axinellid sponges and encrusting sponges. Lophelia pertusa has historically been recorded and recent surveys have observed clumps of Lophelia associated with cobble rubble. Running along the length of the ridge at a depth of 300 m is a habitat containing Saddle oysters, brachiopods, Munida, serpulids, Stylasterids, Cidaris and Lobose sponges. In the northern region of the site, encrusting, globose and lamellate sponges, caryophyllids, Stichopathes and ascidians occur between 950 m and 1,100 m. There are parasitic cones to the north of the site that are characterised by live Lophelia pertusa biogenic reef, supporting a diverse array of antipatharian and gorgonian corals. Two canyons cut into the bank which contain xenophyophores, decapod shrimps, and in the narrower canyon, caryophyllid corals on the floor and sea pens on the canyon flanks. Sediment in-filled dead Lophelia reef framework is found associated with small mound features on the flanks of Rockall Bank. The OSPAR Threatened and/or Declining habitats ‘deep-sea sponge aggregations’ and ‘coral gardens’ are both known to occur in this site.
Site location: Co-ordinates for this SAC can be found in the Standard Data Form listed in the Relevant Documentation section.
Site area: 3,695 km2, this is nearly twice the size of Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park at an area of 1,865 km2.
Site depth range: On the crest of Rockall Bank, minimum water depth in the site is 120 m below sea-level, but depth increases to 1,730 m below sea-level as the seabed slopes down into Rockall Trough.
Charting Progress 2 Biogeographic Region: Atlantic North-West Approaches, Rockall Trough and Faroe/Shetland Channel.
Site boundary description: The boundary is a polygon enclosing the minimum area necessary to ensure protection of the Annex I habitat. As bottom trawling could threaten the reef, the boundary includes a margin to allow for gear to be some distance from the vessel at the surface. Assuming a ratio of 2:1 fishing warp length to depth on the continental shelf, on the western side of the site, where the reef is 400–600 m deep, the boundary includes a margin of 800–1,200 m from the reef. The SAC boundary on the eastern side is 2,000–2,400 m from the reef, relative to the associated depths of between 1,000 m to 1,200 m. To the south, Annex I features extend beyond the UK/Ireland agreement for area delimitation in the Hatton-Rockall section of the continental shelf. Therefore, the southern boundary of the site runs along the edge of UK/Ireland continental shelf boundary.
Last updated: October 2017
The full overview of the range of data used to support site identification, along with information on confidence in feature presence and extent, is available in the East Rockall Bank MPA SAC Selection Assessment Document. JNCC will be adding relevant survey data for this MPA to the Interactive MPA Mapper in due course. Some of the data for this SAC has been collected through JNCC-funded or collaborative surveys and some through other means. Data from these surveys provide direct evidence confirming the presence of the protected features within the site.
Survey and data gathering
- Deep Links Project (2016) – A collaborative project between Plymouth University's Deep Sea CRU and University of Oxford, in partnership with JNCC and British Geological Survey, funded by NERC. During May and June 2016 the team undertook a six week research cruise in the North East Atlantic, including East Rockall Bank, on board the RRS James Cook collecting data. This project aims to investigate the theory that populations at bathyal depths are more isolated because the currents that transport larvae decrease with depth.
- Rockall Survey (2011) – JNCC took part in the Marine Scotland Science Rockall Haddock survey. Opportunistic video tows were taken during fisheries survey down time. The aim was to locate priority marine features (PMFs) and cover significant areas of Annex I reef.
- Survey of Darwin Mounds and North West Rockall (2011) – This cruise was part of the MAREMAP initiative (UK Marine Environmental Mapping Programme) and was a collaboration of multiple organisations including JNCC, Plymouth University and the National Oceanography Centre. The main aim of the survey was to use acoustic and image data to perform benthic habitat mapping in relation to human activity. The survey provided additional evidence for live cold-water coral and coral rubble on the northern flanks of Rockall Bank.
- Anton Dohrn Seamount and East Rockall Bank Survey (2009) – Commissioned by JNCC, this survey was undertaken by the British Geological Survey, University of Plymouth and Marin Mättenik AB. The aim was to acquire high-quality acoustic and photographic “ground-truthing” data to enable the distribution, extent and biological characterisation of Annex I reef. Initial analyses indicate the western flank of the bank is predominantly muddy sand, with coarser sand and gravel on the crest. Bedrock reef was encountered at the 500m depth contour.
- Rockall Bank Surveys (2005-2009) – These surveys were conducted in collaboration with Fisheries Research Services (now Marine Scotland Science) and the University of Plymouth. The aims of these surveys were to identify and map the range of seabed habitats present on the Rockall Bank, identify areas of Annex I reef and to further develop the deep water sections of the EUNIS habitat classification system. These surveys collected video and camera stills. Iceberg plough marks were observed on the seabed, as were areas of semi buried coral fragments.
- Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Survey (2005) – The SEA surveys were commissioned by the Department of Trade and Industry (now Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC)). These surveys, in which JNCC collaborated, collected multibeam and underwater imagery data from areas off the north and west coasts of Scotland. During the 2005 SEA survey, areas of stony reef, bedrock reef and colonies of Lophelia pertusa forming biogenic reef were found on the Rockall Bank.
Data analysis reports
Further analysis of data gathered as part of the surveys listed above are available via the following reports:
- Analysis of biological data from the JC60 survey (2014) – The data from the National Oceanography Centre, University of Plymouth and JNCC survey of Darwin Mounds and North West Rockall, were analysed and provide further evidence of Annex I reef in East Rockall Bank SAC.
- Seabed imagery analysis from Scottish offshore surveys (2014) – JNCC commissioned EcoSol to analyse images from three surveys in Scottish offshore waters; this included video tows from East Rockall Bank SAC. Bedrock and stony reef were positively identified from the videos, and possible Lophelia pertusa reef was also observed. Therefore, the results support the presence of Annex I reef in the site.
- Broadscale habitats of Rockall Bank and mapping of Annex I 'reef' habitat (2009) – Howell et al. (2009) analysed the results from the 2005 and 2006 DTi SEA surveys and routine FRS Scotia surveys undertaken by the Fisheries Research Service (Marine Scotland Science) with participation from JNCC and The University of Plymouth. Areas of stony reef, bedrock reef and colonies of Lophelia pertusa forming biogenic reef were identified on Rockall Bank. Iceberg plough marks and areas of semi buried coral fragments were also observed.
Additional relevant literature
References for further supporting scientific literature consulted during the identification of this site can be found in the East Rockall Bank MPA SAC Selection Assessment. Please be aware that although these sources contain information in relation to this MPA, they do not necessarily represent the views of JNCC.
Last updated: March 2018
Updated formal conservation advice is now available for this MPA. Further information on the approach used to develop this advice is available on our Conservation Advice webpage along with a Glossary of Terms used in JNCC conservation advice and a short video explaining how to use the conservation advice packages.
You must refer to this advice if you:
- undertake a Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA) for a plan or project that could impact the site;
- provide information for a HRA;
- respond to specific measures to support delivery of the conservation objectives for the site; and
- consider the need to put new or additional management measures in place.
You may also find it useful to refer to this advice if you:
- Carry out any other activity that could impact the site.
We will engage with stakeholders to identify any lessons which JNCC can learn from customers who have used the advice, with a view to continuing to ensure it is fit-for-purpose.
The following table provides an overview of the components of the conservation advice, and provides hyperlinks to each of the products for this MPA. These elements together form JNCC’s formal conservation advice for this site and should be read in conjunction with each other. This updated advice replaces the previous Regulation 18 package for the site. This advice reflects the most up-to-date evidence held by JNCC (correct as of March 2018).
|Background Information||Explains the purpose of the advice and when it must be referred to.|
The Conservation Objectives set out the broad ecological aims for the site. JNCC provide supplementary advice in the SACO which is essential reading to support interpretation of these conservation objectives. You can use these documents to assess the impacts of your planned activity on the important attributes of the site.
Please note our current understanding of whether the available evidence indicates that each attribute needs to be restored or maintained is not provided here. However, links to available evidence for the site are provided and should you require further site-specific information for the site, please contact JNCC at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Conservation Advice Statements||
These statements provide a summary of the Supplementary Advice on the Conservation Objectives (SACO)
|Advice on Operations||
Provides information on the activities capable of affecting site integrity and therefore achievement of the site’s conservation objectives.
This is a starting point for determining potential management requirements. It does not take into account the intensity, frequency or cumulative impacts from activities taking place. It is simply to advise you of the possible adverse impacts that your activity can have on a MPA’s features.Use the advice on operations to determine those pressures your activity causes that could harm the habitat and/or species features of the site.
These documents are available on JNCC's Resource Hub.
Activities and Management
Last updated: October 2017
Management status: Progressing towards being well managed.
Progress is ongoing with the recommendation of fisheries management proposals and ongoing site condition monitoring work will be required in order to conclude with confidence as to the degree to which the site is moving towards or achieving its conservation objectives.
This site forms part of the networks of MPAs across the UK and contributes to international MPA networks such as that of the North-east Atlantic under OSPAR. As the UK is a contracting party to the OSPAR Commission, JNCC is committed to ensuring that the OSPAR MPA network is well-managed.
JNCC considers well-managed to mean the timely progress of an MPA around the 'MPA management cycle'. This involves:
- The documentation of appropriate management information – conservation objectives, advice on activities capable of affecting the protected features of a site, and spatial information on the presence and extent of the protected features of a site.
- The implementation of management measures – management actions considered necessary to achieve the conservation objectives of a site.
- Site condition monitoring programmes – collecting the information necessary to determine progress towards a site’s conservation objectives.
- Assessment of progress towards conservation objectives – using available information to infer whether or not a site is moving towards or has achieved its conservation objectives.
The sub-sections that follow provide an account of the progress of East Rockall Bank SAC around each of the four stages in the MPA management cycle:
1. The documentation of appropriate management information
- The conservation objectives and advice on activities capable of affecting the conservation status of the protected feature of this site are available under the Conservation Advice section. Further information is available on our conservation advice webpages.
- Spatial information on the presence and extent of the protected feature of this MPA is available via JNCC’s MPA mapper.
- JNCC is in the process of developing downloadable MPA data packages where appropriate permissions to share datasets are in place.
2. The implementation of management measures
This section details progress towards the implementation of management measures for activities considered capable of affecting the conservation status of the protected features of the site. The protected features of the site are considered to be sensitive to pressures associated with fishing and 'licensable' activities.
- Prior to 2016 there is evidence of mobile demersal, static and pelagic effort within the MPA, and UK and non-UK registered vessels have been active in the area.
- Marine Scotland is the lead authority regarding the implementation of, and compliance with, any measures to managing fishing activity. Further information on progress is available via Marine Scotland's webpages.
- In compliance with Part 5, Chapter 7 of The Common Fisheries Policy and Aquaculture (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Statutory Instrument (S.I.) 2019 No. 753, there is a ban on the use of all bottom-contacting mobile gear below 800 m depth across all UK waters. This applies across the area of East Rockall Bank MPA where the depth falls below 800 m.
- Part 5 Chapter 7 of S.I. 2019, No. 753 also implements restrictions on fishing between 400 m and 800 m where Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs) are present, or are likely to occur. These rules aim to minimise the impact of fishing activities on VMEs.
- Under The Common Fisheries Policy and Animals (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 S.I. 2019, No. 1312 (amending S.I. 2019, No. 753) there is a prohibition on the use of bottom-set gillnets, entangling nets, and trammel nets at depths greater than 200 m for the protection of deepwater shark species. These protective measures are also applied in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) technical measures regulatory area (beyond European Union waters) through the same S.I.
- Whilst 'licensable' activities such as oil and gas exploration and production do not take place within East Rockall Bank SAC at present, any future proposals would have to comply with Regulation 28 (Protection of European offshore marine sites and European sites) in The Conservation of Offshore Marine Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (as amended).
- Our conservation advice supports the consents process by setting out the conservation objectives for the protected feature of this MPA and advice on activities that may result in pressures to which the protected feature is considered sensitive.
- Further information on JNCC's role in the provision of advice for licensed activities in the UK offshore area is available on JNCC's offshore industry advice webpages.
- One telecommunications cable currently crosses through the MPA.
- Cables are largely an unregulated activity in offshore waters depending upon the type of cable being laid (or maintained), where it is being laid between and whether the cable is part of a larger development (which may be regulated). Any cable not directly associated with an energy installation does not require a marine license beyond 12 nautical miles.
- JNCC encourages early discussion from operators regarding any plans related to new or existing cables, and encourages the undertaking of non-statutory environmental impact assessments for new or existing cable projects to assess their effect on the protected features of the MPA.
3. Site condition monitoring
Fishing vessel monitoring data are collected within the site. Site condition monitoring surveys are yet to take place within this MPA. Further information will be made available within the Monitoring section in due course.
4. Assessment of progress towards conservation objectives
No long-term condition monitoring data are available to determine whether the MPA is moving towards or has reached its conservation objectives. The site has a 'restore' conservation objective based on the findings of a vulnerability assessment which suggests the site is unlikely to be moving towards its conservation objectives. Further information will be provided within the Assessment section as it becomes available.
Last updated: October 2017
JNCC is currently leading on the development of a strategy for biodiversity monitoring across all UK waters, to include MPA monitoring. For MPAs, data and evidence collected from monitoring activities will aim to:
- Enable assessment of condition of the features within sites;
- Enable assessment of the degree to which management measures are effective in achieving the conservation objectives for the protected features;
- Support the identification of priorities for future protection and/or management; and,
- Enable Government to fulfil its national and international assessment and reporting commitments in relation to MPAs and help identify where further action may be required.
Last updated: October 2017
Assessments of the condition of designated features in offshore MPAs are required to report against our legal obligations. Ideally these assessments should be based on observed data, and then measured against targets for pre-defined indicators. However, for MPAs in offshore waters we do not always have the appropriate information to be able to do so. This is particularly true for seabed habitats, which are the main type of feature designated for protection in offshore MPAs.
To address these challenges, JNCC has been an active partner in the development of new approaches and tools for the assessment of habitats and species for a variety of national and international status reports.
Conservation Assessment Reports
Every six years, Member States of the European Union are required (by Article 17 of the Directive) to report on implementation of the Habitats Directive. The latest report on the Conservation Status of Annex I habitats and Annex II species on the Habitats Directive was submitted by the UK in 2019 and provided an assessment of the conservation status of relevant habitats and species within UK marine waters during period 2013–2018; information on the condition of features within SACs have made a contribution to this report.
Charting Progress 2 (CP2) published in 2010, is a comprehensive report on the state of the UK seas. It was published by the UK Marine Monitoring and Assessment Strategy (UKMMAS) community which has over 40 member organisations. The report was based on a robust, peer-reviewed evidence base and describes progress made since the publication of Charting Progress in 2005. It provides key findings from UK marine research and monitoring for use by policy makers and others, as we move towards the UK vision of clean, healthy, safe, productive and biologically diverse oceans and seas. The results from CP2 were incorporated into the UK Marine Strategy Part 1: UK Initial Assessment and Good Environmental Status published in 2012 under the UK Marine Strategy Regulations (2010). The UK Marine Strategy Part 1 (2012) also set out the UK’s definition for Good Environmental Status, which could be achieved by meeting a series of environmental targets. JNCC worked with other organisations in the UKMMAS community to develop a series of indicators that were used to assess progress against each of the targets and to report on progress made since 2012. The results of these assessments have been published in the UK Marine Strategy Part 1: UK Updated Assessment and Good Environmental Status in 2019. Detailed evidence used to make these assessments is available via the Marine Online Assessment Tool (MOAT). It also sets out proposals for updated high-level objectives, targets and operational targets to be used for 2018 to 2024, which build on those set in 2012.
It is worth noting the two other parts of the UK Marine Strategy: UK Marine Strategy Part Two: marine monitoring programmes, published in 2014 and UK Marine Strategy Part Three: programme of measures published in 2015. Updates to these will be made in 2020 and 2021 respectively.
OSPAR Quality Status Reports
Many of the assessments in the updated UK Marine Strategy Part 1 2019 were developed and produced in collaboration with other contracting Parties of the OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the North East Atlantic. In 2017 OSPAR published its Intermediate Assessment (IA2017). The IA 2017 further develops OSPAR’s understanding of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic and its current status. It demonstrates OSPAR’s progress towards realising its vision of a clean, healthy and biologically diverse North-East Atlantic, used sustainably. IA2017 follows on from OSPAR’s previous holistic assessment, the OSPAR Quality Status Report in 2010 (QSR2010) and in 2000 (QSR2000).
JNCC continues to develop and pilot tools for the assessment of marine habitats and species in offshore waters to improve the quality and transparency of our offshore MPA assessments, and contribute to the monitoring of marine biodiversity in UK waters. These tools cover methods for producing interim assessments of site features and their responses to pressures, as well as developing more robust indicators for determining condition of the features.