C8. Mammals of the wider countryside (bats)
Type: State Indicator
This indicator shows changes in the relative abundance of 11 of the UK’s 17 breeding bat species, based on data from transect surveys, roost counts and counts at hibernation sites. Whilst 11 species are included there are only 10 species trends, as an aggregate trend is used for the whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus) and Brandt’s bat (Myotis brandtii); these 2 species are difficult to distinguish between in the field. Bat species make up a third of the UK’s mammal fauna and occur in most lowland habitats across the UK.
- Key results
- Goals and Targets
- Web links for further information
The bat index has increased by 45% between 1999 and 2018. In the short term, between 2013 and 2018, the bat index has increased by 10%.
The bat index is a composite of 10 species trends (11 species, 2 of which are combined). Since 1999, 5 of the bat species trends included in the index have increased and 5 have shown little change. The UK’s rarer and more specialised bat species are not included in the index due to difficulties monitoring these species.
The increase in the index is underpinned by large statistically significant increases in populations of 3 species, greater horseshoe bat, lesser horseshoe bat and common pipistrelle. These increases indicate that some bat species are starting to recover after what are believed to have been major population declines during the 20th century.
Figure C8i. Trends in bat populations, 1999 to 2019.
- The line graph shows the unsmoothed trend (dashed line) and smoothed trend (solid line) with its 95% confidence interval (shaded).
- The figure in brackets shows the number of species in the index.
- This indicator includes measures for 11 species of bats; the index only includes 10 trends. This is because an aggregate trend is used for the whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus) and Brandt’s bat (Myotis brandtii); these 2 species have been combined due to difficulties with distinguishing between them in the field.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of species trends which, over the time periods of the long-term and short-term assessments, have shown a statistically significant increase or decline, or little change.
- Since 2018, this indicator has been extended to include 11 species instead of 8. The complete time series in the accompanying dataset was also updated to reflect these changes.
Source: Bat Conservation Trust.
The smoothed bat index increased every year between the 1999 baseline year and 2009, it was then relatively stable between 2009 and 2013, before increasing again between 2013 and 2018 (see below for an explanation of the assessment). However, the composite indicator masks variation between the species that contribute to it. The long-term increase in the indicator is primarily driven by strong increases in 3 species; greater horseshoe bat, lesser horseshoe bat and common pipistrelle and between 1999 and 2018, the combined survey trend for these species increased by 156%, 109% and 91% respectively. Two other species showed weaker increases over the same period, and the remaining 5 species showed little change. In the short term, between 2013 and 2018, 5 species have increased significantly and the rest show little short-term change. No species show a decline in either the long or short term, however it is not possible to produce separate trends for whiskered bat and Brandt’s bat, as they cannot be reliably distinguished between in the field. It is therefore possible that an increase in one species could mask a decline in the other. It is also important to note that the UK’s rarer and more specialised bat species are not included in the index due to difficulties monitoring these species.
Assessment of change in widespread bat populations
|Long term||Short term||Latest year|
||No change (2019)|
Note: Long-term and short-term assessments are made on the basis of smoothed trends to the penultimate year (2018) by the Bat Conservation Trust. This is because the most recent smoothed data point (2019) is likely to change in next year’s update when additional data are included for 2020. The latest year change is based on unsmoothed data.
Bat populations utilise a range of habitats across the landscape and are sensitive to pressures in the urban, suburban and rural environment. All bats and their roosts are protected by domestic and European legislation. The UK is a signatory to the EUROBATs agreement, set up under the Convention on Migratory Species, with the intention of conserving all European bat populations. The wider relevance of bats as biodiversity indicators is presented in Jones et al. (2009).
The species used in this index (Table C8i) occur throughout a variety of landscapes including urban areas, farmland, woodland, and river/lake systems. All bats in the UK feed at night and prey on insects. To thrive, they require adequate roosting opportunities (particularly for breeding and hibernating), foraging habitat and connected landscape features, such as hedgerows and tree lines, which assist them in commuting between roost sites and feeding locations.
Key pressures on bats, including landscape change, agricultural intensification, development, habitat fragmentation, are also relevant to many other wildlife groups. Bats are believed to have experienced major declines throughout Western Europe during the 20th century, which have been attributed to persecution, agricultural intensification, habitat and roost loss, remedial timber treatment and declines of their insect prey. Evidence of these declines (synthesised in Haysom et al., 2010) is fragmented as during this period few data were collected in a systematic way. Evidence includes:
- Well documented range contractions of greater horseshoe bat and lesser horseshoe bat across Great Britain and Europe.
- Reports of the loss of large colonies of several species from traditional roosting sites.
- Reductions in the number of known maternity colonies across Great Britain.
- A small number of published population trends (e.g. Ransome, 1989; Guest et al., 2002).
The bat index and long-term assessment reflect changes in bat populations since 1999 and indicate that more recently some UK bat populations are beginning to recover. This recovery is in line with a prototype European indicator of trends in bat populations, developed from counts at hibernation sites in 9 European countries including the UK (Haysom et al., 2014). The greatest weight of evidence suggests that 2 factors have had a positive impact on bat populations: a reduction in human disturbance since the introduction of strict legal protection and a milder climate (Burns et al., 2016), in particular over winter and spring, which has been shown to benefit horseshoe bat species (Battersby, 2005; Froidevaux et al., 2017; Schofield, 2008). The impact of climate change on other UK bat species is less clear. Bats have also benefited from direct conservation action and public education (Mitchell-Jones 1993; Haysom et al., 2010), but remain vulnerable to pressures such as landscape change, climate change, development and emerging threats such as new building practices, wind turbines, and light pollution (Haysom et al., 2010; Kunz et al., 2007; Rebelo et al., 2010; Stone et al., 2009, 2012).
The National Bat Monitoring Programme was established in 1996, with the first surveys undertaken in 1997. It currently delivers trends for 11 of the UK’s 17 breeding bat species (2 of which are combined) and has deployed over 3,800 volunteers to record observations at 6,602 sites (see Figure C8ii).
Since 2018, this indicator has been extended to include 11 bat species instead of 8. Data were updated for the entire dataset to include all 11 bat species.
Figure C8ii. Location of National Bat Monitoring Programme monitoring sites.
This indicator shows changes in the relative abundance of 11 of the UK’s 17 breeding bat species: brown long-eared bat, common pipistrelle, Daubenton's bat, greater horseshoe bat, lesser horseshoe bat, Natterer’s bat, noctule, serotine, soprano pipistrelle and whiskered/Brandt’s bat (the latter 2 species cannot be distinguished between during monitoring surveys and so are treated as one species group). It is compiled by the Bat Conservation Trust using data collected annually from the National Bat Monitoring Programme (NBMP). Surveys for these species include summer roost counts, counts at hibernation sites and visual and/or acoustic observations made along predetermined transects. Most species are surveyed by 2 different survey methods, both of which are included in the index apart from summer roost count data for common and soprano pipistrelle. Frequent ‘roost switching’ by these 2 species of bats can cause a negative bias in trends calculated from summer roost counts, so these data are omitted.
For each species, Generalised Additive Modelling (GAM) is used to calculate the trends in numbers over time (Fewster et al., 2000). The models include terms for factors that can influence the apparent population averages (e.g. bat detector model, temperature, etc.), so their effect can be taken into account. The GAM models produce smoothed trends which are more robust against random variation between years. For easier interpretation the means are then converted to an index that is set to 100 for the selected baseline year of data. The species indices are revised when new data become available or when improved modelling methods are developed and applied retrospectively to data from earlier years. As such, indices published in previous years are not strictly comparable to the current index. To generate the composite bat indicator and confidence intervals, each species has been given equal weighting, and the annual index figure is the geometric mean in that year (Figure C8i). Confidence intervals are relatively wide due to the high variability inherent in bat monitoring data and the rarity of several species. Long and short-term assessments are run to the penultimate year of the trend as the most recent year’s smoothed data point is likely to change as future years of data are added. The latest year change is based on unsmoothed data. The survey methods and statistical analysis used by the NBMP to produce individual species trends are described in Barlow et al. (2015).
Table C8i. Long-term and short-term percentage change in the species trends used in the bat indicator
|brown long-eared bat
greater horseshoe bat
|lesser horseshoe bat
Myotis mystacinus/Myotis brandtii
* Denotes a statistically significant change (based on smoothed data).
Note: To better capture patterns in the data, long-term and short-term assessments are made on the basis of smoothed data, with analysis of the underlying trend undertaken by Bat Conservation Trust. All 11 species are protected through Annex IV of the Habitats Directive. Greater horseshoe bat and lesser horseshoe bat are also listed on Annex II of the Directive – leading to Special Areas of Conservation being designated for these species.
Goals and Targets
Aichi Targets for which this is a primary indicator
Strategic Goal C. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity.
Target 12: By 2020, the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.
Aichi Targets for which this is a relevant indicator
Strategic Goal B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.
Target 5: By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.
Strategic Goal C. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity.
Target 11: By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascapes.
Web links for further information
|Bat Conservation Trust||The National Bat Monitoring Programme|
|EUROBATS||EUROBATS (The Agreement on the Conservation of Populations of European bats)|
|European Environment Agency||European bat population trends – a prototype biodiversity indicator|
Barlow, K.E., Briggs, P.A., Haysom, K.A., Hutson, A.M., Lechiara, N.L., Racey, P.A., Walsh, A.L. & Langton, S.D. (2015) Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: the National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain. Biological Conservation, 182, 14–26.
Battersby, J. (2005). UK Mammals: Species Status and Population Trends. First Report by the Tracking Mammals Partnership. Peterborough, UK
Burns, F., Eaton M.A., Barlow, K.E., Beckmann, B.C., Brereton, T., Brooks, D.R., Brown, P.M.J., Al Fulaij, A., Gent, T., Henderson, I., Noble, D.G., Parsons, M., Powney, G.D., Gregory, R.D. (2016) Agricultural Management and Climatic Change Are the Major Drivers of Biodiversity Change in the UK. PLoS ONE 11, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151595
Fewster, R.M., Buckland, S.T., Siriwardena, G.M., Baillie, S.R. & Wilson, J.D. (2000) Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalized additive models. Ecology, 81, 1970–1984.
Froidevaux, J.S.P., Boughey, K.L., Barlow, K.E., Jones, G. (2017). Factors driving population recovery of the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in the UK: implications for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 1–21.
Guest, P., Jones, K.E. & Tovey, J. (2002) Bats in Greater London: unique evidence of a decline over 15 years. British Wildlife, 13, 1–5.
Haysom, K.A., Jones, G., Merrett, D. & Racey, P.A. (2010) Bats. In: N. Maclean, ed. Silent Summer: The State of Wildlife in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, 259–280.
Haysom, K.A., Dekker, J., van der Meij, T. & van Strien, A. (2014) European bat population trends. A prototype biodiversity indicator. EEA Technical Report No. 19/2013. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg.
Jones, G., Jacobs, D.S., Kunz, T.H., Willig, M.R. & Racey, P.A. (2009) Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endangered Species Research, 8, 93–115.
Kunz, T.H., Arnett, E.B., Erickson, W.P., Hoar, A.R., Johnson, G.D., Larkin, R.P., Strickland, M.D., Thresher, R.W. & Tuttle, M.D. (2007) Ecological impacts of wind energy development on bats: questions, research needs, and hypotheses. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 315–324.
Mitchell-Jones, A.J. (1993) The growth and development of bat conservation in Britain. Mammal Review, 23, 139–148.
Ransome, R.D. (1989) Population changes of Greater horseshoe bats studied near Bristol over the past twenty-six years. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 38, 71–82.
Rebelo, H., Tarroso, P. & Jones, G. (2010) Predicted impact of climate change on European bats in relation to their biogeographic patterns. Global Change Biology, 16(2), 561–576.
Schofield, H. (2008). The Lesser Horseshoe Bat Conservation Handbook. Vincent Wildlife Trust, Herefordshire.
Stone, E.L., Jones, G. & Harris, S. (2009) Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Current Biology, 19, 1123–1127.
Stone, E.L., Jones, G. & Harris, S. (2012) Conserving energy at a cost to biodiversity? Impacts of LED lighting on bats. Global Change Biology, 18, 2458–2465.
Download the Datasheet and Technical background document from JNCC's Resource Hub.
Last updated: October 2020
Latest data available: 2019
This content is available on request as a pdf in non-accessible format. If you wish for a copy please go to the enquiries page.